![]() For example, if you elect to launch another browser window, PASSPORT first gives you the option of automatically opening another browser window or terminating the host session before viewing another HTML page. In providing this tight integration, PASSPORT offers advanced session management that assists the user in viewing other HTML pages. Users will also find the 3270, 5250, VT100/VT220 and SCO ANSI host session merged with the framework of the Internet Explorer browser. They can also have use of the full PC keyboard, just as they had with desktop emulation. Further, in choosing the 32-bit software for host access, users can continue to use Windows functions like Cut, Copy and Paste. In fact, experts claim that a C++ application like PASSPORT can be up to 70% faster than a Java™-based solution. Thus, companies that use Windows XP and 2000 as their primary desktop platform will find the 32-bit architecture of PASSPORT to be significantly faster and more usable than the 8-bit interpretive Java™ design of HOD. PASSPORT WEB TO HOST was designed specifically for Windows. Yet the two solutions are very different. Both solutions include an extensive list of features normally found only in desktop-based emulation. How does PASSPORT WEB TO HOST differ from IBM Host on Demand?įrom an architectural and feature perspective, two web to host terminal emulation products lead the market: PASSPORT WEB TO HOST from Zephyr and Host on Demand (HOD) from IBM®. ![]() Zephyr took this development strategy since the overwhelming majority of terminal emulation runs on a Windows platform. The 32-bit ActiveX solution was designed specifically for Windows and Internet Explorer, which makes the C++ application extremely fast and completely Windows compliant in terms of using Cut, Copy, Paste, Windows short-cut keys, the full PC keyboard, etc. PASSPORT is ideal for use on Windows 2003 server or with Windows XP desktops. PS: Since you're just talking about the case where you're developing a project, I think this temporary way is more appropriate than putting it in system-wide configuration files.Is PASSPORT Windows XP and Windows 2003 Server compliant? Since the library search path will be written into the binary, this will work even on different machines (provided the library exists) ![]() Wl specifies commmand line arguments that will not be processed by gcc but instead be passed to the linker. Or you link using a 'static' library search paths like this: gcc file1.o file2.o -L./lib/3rdpartylib -Wl,-rpath=./lib/3rdpartylib -l3rdpartylib -o myapp This will only work in you current shell and you will have to set it again everytime. (the last part is for preserving the variable if it was already set, which it shouldn't be normally). export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$PROJ/lib/3rdpartylib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" Just set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the PATH of your library (you did set it to the library itself, that won't work), the same which you set with the -L parameter to gcc e.g. If you don't want to set a global library search path for your whole system with the /etc/env.d approach, you can either: If it is of any help, my main machine is a Debian box, and my "new" machine is a Sabayon (Gentoo), running in Virtualbox. What am I missing? Why does it work on my main machine (where LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not set to anything) and not on the other machine? Does it matter that the other machine is a virtual one? It bothers me to have this variable set up every time I want to run my app. But I understand that using LD_LIBRARY_PATH is a bad practice. I tried doing the following: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/3rdpartylib.so myapp: error while loading shared libraries: 3rdpartylib.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory However when I tried to launch the application I got the following error message. It compiled and linked without any problem. Today I tried to launch it on another machine. When I am on my main machine, it works perfectly. Then I link: $ gcc file1.o file2.o -l3rdpartylib -L lib/3rdpartylib -o myapp Then I compile each of my source files like this: $ gcc -c src/file.c -I include -o file.o -l 3rdparylib -L lib/3rdpartylib -I lib/3rdpartylib/include I compile the software by doing the following steps: $ cd lib/3rdpartylib/ ![]() I didn't code 3rdpartylib, but decided to embed its source code in my project packaging. My project tree looks something like that: src/
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |